The immune system plays a central role in defending the body from infection and maintaining the integrity of the organism. The immune system also may play an important role in the host response to neoplasia. Many effective antitumor immune mechanisms have been described. However, it is no longer clear whether antitumor immune responses operate in immune surveillance, at least as this concept was defined originally.^1,2 For example, patients who are immune-deficient have a higher frequency of cancer, but the tumors that develop in these patients tend to be lymphoproliferative tumors, such as lymphoma, or unusual forms of cancer, such as Kaposi sarcoma in AIDS.³ Therefore, the role of the immune system in preventing cancer may be restricted. However, there is no doubt that the immune system can interact with tumor cells in various ways, and that immune responses, whether natural or induced, can lead to tumor regression. As more is learned about the interactions between cancer and the immune system, opportunities for new immunotherapeutic and immunodiagnostic approaches become apparent. In this chapter, a brief overview of immunology and of biologic therapies relevant to gynecologic cancers is presented.

Various types of human immune response can be used to target and respond to tumor cells.^2,4,5,6 Immune responses historically have been categorized as humoral or cellular, a distinction based on the observation in experimental systems that some immune responses could be transferred by serum (humoral) and others by cells (cellular). Generally, humoral responses refer to antibody responses. Antibodies are antigen-reactive, soluble, bifunctional molecules that are composed of specific antigen-binding sites that are associated with a constant region that directs the biologic activities of the antibody molecule, such as binding to effector cells or complement activation. Cellular immune responses are mediated directly by activated immune cells rather than by the production of antibodies. Most immune responses involve both humoral and cellular components; specific immune responses involve the coordinated activities of populations of lymphocytes, operating in concert with each other and with antigen-presenting cells, resulting in some effector function. Cellular interactions involved in immune responses include direct cell-to-cell contact as well as cellular interactions mediated by the secretion of and response to cytokines, biologic messenger molecules that play important roles in the genesis, amplification, and effector functions of immune responses.

Immune responses also can be categorized as involving innate or adaptive immunity. Adaptive immunity refers to antigen-specific responses, which include the evolution of antigen-specific immunologic memory, and the expansion and amplification of antigen-specific effector functions. Innate responses refer to a variety of nonantigen-specific mechanisms, which are present at all times and do not necessarily increase with repeated exposure to a given antigen.² An example of an adaptive immune response would be the generation of specific cytolytic T cells (CTL) directed to a tumor-associated antigen. An innate antitumor response would be the killing of tumor cells by exposure to natural killer (NK) cells. Both innate and adaptive immune responses can exert potent antitumor activity.

T Lymphocytes and Antitumor Immunity

T lymphocytes play a pivotal role in the generation of immune responses, by acting as helper cells in the generation of humoral and cellular immune responses, and as effector cells in cellular responses.^4,5 T-lymphocyte precursors mature into functional T lymphocytes in the thymus, where they learn to recognize antigen in the context of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules of the specific person. Most T lymphocytes with the capability of responding to the self are removed during thymic development. T lymphocytes can be distinguished from other types of lymphocytes by their biologic activities and by the expression of distinctive cell surface molecules, including the T-cell antigen receptor and CD3 molecular complex. The expression of lymphocyte cell surface molecules can be quantified by flow cytometry with fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies that can bind these molecules specifically. There are two major subsets of T lymphocytes: T helper/inducer cells, which express the CD4 cell surface marker, and T cytotoxic cells, which express the CD8 marker. CD4 T lymphocytes can provide help to B lymphocytes, resulting in antibody production, and also can act as helper cells for other T lymphocytes. Much of the helper activity of T lymphocytes is affected by the production of cytokines, such as interleukin-2 (IL-2). The CD8 T-lymphocyte subset includes cells that are cytotoxic (i.e., can kill target cells directly).

A major biologic function of CTLs is the lysis of virus-infected cells. However, CTLs can directly mediate the lysis of tumor cells, presumably by recognizing unique antigens presented by tumor cells. CTLs can kill tumor cells by signaling the induction of apoptosis in the target cells, and by the secretion of perforin, a pore-forming protein.⁴ T cells also can contribute to antitumor immune responses by producing cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), which induce tumor cell lysis and can enhance other antitumor cell effector responses.

T lymphocytes recognize specific antigens by interactions that involve the T-cell antigen receptor.^4,5 In terms of its general structure and molecular organization, the T-cell antigen receptor is reminiscent of the antibody molecule. However, there are major differences between the antigen receptor molecules on B lymphocytes and those on T lymphocytes; for one, the T-cell receptor is not secreted. Also, the B-cell antigen receptor interacts with antigen in a different way than the T-cell receptor; the T-cell antigen receptor can see antigen only when it is presented to it in association with self MHC molecules, on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell. The B-cell antigen receptor can bind antigen directly, and therefore is not restricted in this way.

B Lymphocytes and Antibodies

B lymphocytes are the cells that produce and secrete antibodies.² After exposure to antigen and appropriate activation signals, they differentiate to become plasma cells, terminally differentiated cells that produce large quantities of antibodies. Pre-B cells originate from progenitor stem cells after the rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes from their germ cell configuration to the configuration that result in a functional immunoglobulin molecule. Mature B lymphocytes use cell surface immunoglobulin molecules as antigen receptors. In addition to producing antibodies, B lymphocytes play another important role: they can serve as efficient antigen-presenting cells for T lymphocytes.

The production of antitumor cell antibodies does not appear to play a central role in host antitumor immune responses, but monoclonal antibodies that are reactive with tumor-associated antigens may prove useful in antitumor therapy, or for tumor detection. Immunotoxin-conjugated monoclonal antibodies directed to antigens expressed by human ovarian adenocarcinoma effect tumor cell killing in experimental animal systems.⁷ Several obstacles had to be overcome before monoclonal antibodies were of practical clinical utility, especially the generation of host immune responses directed to foreign antigens on monoclonal antibodies of murine origin. Because most monoclonal antibodies are of murine and not human origin, the host's immune system can recognize and respond to murine monoclonal antibodies. The preparation of humanized murine monoclonal antibodies (i.e., genetically engineered monoclonal antibodies composed of human constant regions with specific antigen-reactive murine variable regions) has alleviated many of the problems associated with the administration of murine monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibody-based agents are being used increasingly in antitumor therapies.

Macrophages, Monocytes, and Dendritic Cells

Monocyte/macrophages play important roles in immune responses. Macrophages, which form an important part of innate immune responses, also play a key role in the generation of adaptive, antigen-specific, lymphocyte-mediated immune responses, because they can act as effective antigen-presenting cells. Helper/inducer (CD4) T lymphocytes, bearing a T-cell receptor of appropriate antigen and self specificity, can be activated by antigen-presenting macrophages that display processed antigen combined with self MHC molecules (MHC class II molecules). Antigen presenting cells also provide important costimulatory signals that are important for the induction of T-lymphocyte activation. In addition to serving as antigen-presenting cells, macrophages can ingest and kill microorganisms, and can act as cytotoxic, antitumor killer cells. Also, macrophages and monocytes produce various cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, chemokines (RANTES, MIP1α, MIP1βIL-8), IL-10, and TNF, which can be involved in both innate and adaptive immune responses, and which can have direct biologic effects on tumor cells, both as growth-inducing and growth-inhibiting factors.

Mature dendritic cells also are highly efficient antigen-presenting cells for T cells.⁸ In fact, the dendritic cells found in lymphoid tissue are the most potent stimulators of naive T cells. Mature dendritic cells express very high levels of MHC class I and class II molecules, as well as high levels of adhesion molecules and cell surface lymphocyte stimulatory molecules, such as the B7 molecule. Also, these dendritic cells secrete chemotactic factors (chemokines) that attract T cells. Together, these features explain, in part, their ability to act as highly efficient antigen-presenting cells for T lymphocytes.

Natural Killer Cells and Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity

NK cells have characteristically large granular lymphocyte morphologic features. NK cells do not express the CD3–T-cell receptor complex, but they can express some markers that are shared with T lymphocytes or other types of lymphocytes, in addition to other NK-associated markers. NK cells can lyse target cells, including tumor cells, unrestricted by the expression of antigen on the target cell.^4,5,9 Therefore, NK cells are effector cells in an innate (nonantigen-restricted) type of immune response, and they may play a vital role in the nonspecific killing of tumor cells or virus-infected cells. NK cells represent an innate form of immunity that does not require an adaptive memory response for biologic function, but NK responses can be augmented by cytokines, such as IL-2. NK cells can be stimulated to kill target cells that do not express MHC class I molecules. MHC class I molecules, which normally are expressed on all nucleated cells, play a central role in the display of endogenously synthesized antigens to CD8⁺ CTLs. Many viruses subvert CTLs by down-regulating the expression of MHC class I molecules, effectively hiding such virus-infected cells from T-cell killing. However, NK cells can then detect and kill such MHC class I-negative cells. Therefore, NK cells provide an important fail-safe role in the detection of virus infected host cells that have evaded T-cell immunity.

The cells that can effect antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) are NK-like cells. ADCC can result in the lysis of tumor cell targets in vitro. Although the mechanisms of tumor cell killing in ADCC are not clearly understood, close cellular contact appears to be required between the ADCC effector cell and the target cell.

Cytokines, Lymphokines, and Immune Mediators

Cytokines are soluble mediator molecules that induce, enhance, or affect immune responses. Cytokines are heterogenous, representing several molecular superfamilies, typically have multiple and redundant biologic actions, are produced by various types of cells, and play critical roles, not only in immune responses but also in biologic responses outside of the immune response, such as hematopoiesis or the acute-phase response. Most cytokines are small or medium secreted proteins, are produced transiently and locally, and interact with specific cellular receptors, resulting in signal transduction followed by changes in cellular proliferation or differentiation in the target cell.

Although cytokines are heterogeneous and generally share little structural or amino acid homology, some cytokines appear to have evolved from common ancestral precursors, and are classified as forming members of a cytokine molecular superfamily. Cytokine superfamilies include the hematopoietins (IL-2, IL4, IL-6, and related cytokines, interferons), the TNF-like cytokines (TNF-α, lymphotoxin and related molecules), chemokines (IL-8, RANTES, and related cytokines), and the IL-1-like cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1α, IL-1RA, IL-18)(Table 1).

Table 1. Cytokines: Molecular Superfamilies

IL-2 induces T-lymphocyte proliferation, and is produced primarily by activated T lymphocytes.⁴ T lymphocytes secrete IL-2, express the IL-2 receptor, and respond to IL-2 by proliferating. Much of the helper activity of T lymphocytes is mediated by IL-2. IL-2 interacts with specific IL-2 receptors on the surface of the target cell; the high-affinity IL-2 receptor is composed of three polypeptides, the CD25α, CD122β, and CD132γ chains, which unassociated have much lower binding affinity for IL-2. T-cell activation results in greatly increased numbers of the high-affinity receptor for IL-2 on the surface of these cells. IL-2 has other biologic activities, including the induction of B-lymphocyte activation and maturation, and monocyte and NK-cell activation.

B-lymphocyte activation and differentiation to immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells are enhanced by cytokines that are produced by helper T lymphocytes or monocytes. Several cytokines, originally described as B-cell-stimulating factors, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6, have additional biologic activities. For instance, IL-6, a factor that can induce B-lymphocyte differentiation to immunoglobulin-secreting cells, is a pleiotropic cytokine¹⁰ with biologic activities that include the induction of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte differentiation, the induction of acute-phase reactant production by hepatocytes, and activity as a colony-stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cells. IL-6 is produced primarily by activated monocytes and macrophages and T lymphocytes. IL-6 interacts with a specific receptor complex composed of two molecules: CD126 (IL-6R) and CD130 (gp130). The CD126 molecule is essential for effective binding of IL-6 to the receptor complex, while the CD130 molecule is responsible for signal transduction. Both of these receptor molecules must be expressed for effective IL-6 signaling. There are several IL-6-like cytokines, including IL-11, Oncostatin-M, leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF), and ciliary neurotropic factor (CNTF).¹⁰ Also, a virus-encoded IL-6 (vIL-6) homologue has been reported; the human herpesvirus type 8 (HHV-8) open reading frame (ORF)-K2 gene product is similar to human IL-6 in structure and function.¹¹ Interestingly, several types of tumor cells produce IL-6, and IL-6 has been proposed to act as an autocrine and paracrine growth factor for different types of neoplasms.¹² However, IL-6 may be an effective antitumor agent because of its ability to enhance antitumor T-cell-mediated immune responsiveness.¹³.

IL-3, a factor that can enhance the early differentiation of hematopoietic cells,¹⁴ may have a role in immunotherapy because of its ability to induce hematopoietic differentiation in people undergoing aggressive chemotherapeutic treatment or bone marrow transplantation. IL-10 is an immune-inhibitory cytokine.¹⁵ IL-12 is a recently described T-cell-stimulating and NK-stimulating cytokine, which is thought to play a key role in the induction of type 1, or TH1, immune responses.¹⁶ TNF-α is a cytokine that can be cytotoxic for tumor cells, can enhance immune cell-mediated cellular cytotoxicity, and can activate macrophages and induce monokine secretion. Other biologic activities of TNF-α include the induction of cachexia, inflammation, and fever. This cytokine is an important mediator of endotoxin shock.

There are three types of interferons: interferon-α (IFN-α), interferon-β (IFN-β), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ).^4,16 Interferons, which form a family of molecules within the hematopoietin superfamily, are cytokines that can interfere with viral production in infected cells and, in addition to this, have various effects on the immune system. For instance, IFN-γ, a T-lymphocyte-produced cytokine, can affect immune function by enhancing the induction of MHC molecules expression, enhancing the activity of antigen-presenting cells, and thereby enhancing T-lymphocyte activation.

As research has provided new information on the biologic activities of cytokines, these factors have appeared to be extraordinarily pleiotropic, with a bewildering array of biologic activities, some of which occur outside of the immune system. However, the recognition of two types of helper T cells, the type 1 (TH1) and type 2 (TH2) subsets of CD4⁺ helper T cells, has brought some order to this otherwise bewildering situation. This is because the distinction between these helper cell subsets is based on the pattern of cytokines produced by these subsets; TH1 and TH2 subsets control the nature of an immune response by secreting characteristic and mutually antagonistic sets of cytokines.⁴ TH1 clones produce IL-2 and IFN-γ, while TH2 clones produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10 (Table 2). TH1 responses are characterized by enhanced cell-mediated immune and inflammatory responses, including increased macrophage activation and enhanced T-cell proliferation and activation. TH2 responses are dominated by enhanced humoral responses, including increased B-cell activation and antibody production. Most immune responses involve both TH1 and TH2 responses, although some responses are dominated by either a TH1 or TH2 response pattern. The pattern of cytokines produced by TH1 or TH2 cells determines the type of immune response seen. For example, IL-10 inhibits the production of IFN-γ and other cytokines by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), as well as suppressing the release of cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) by activated monocytes. Also, IL-10 down-regulates class II MHC expression on monocytes, resulting in a strong reduction in the antigen-presenting capacity of these cells, and acts as a direct B-cell stimulatory factor. IL-12, however, is a potent stimulator of IFN-γ, and induces a TH1-type immune response.¹⁶ Because some cytokines have direct or indirect antitumor or immune-enhancing effects, several of these factors have been used in the experimental treatment of cancer.

Table 2. Cytokines: Biological Activities

The precise roles of cytokines in antitumor immune responses have not been described completely. Because cytokines are pleiotropic, they may exert antitumor effects through many different direct or indirect activities. In fact, it is possible that a single cytokine could enhance tumor growth directly by acting as a growth factor while enhancing immune responses directed at the tumor. However, the potential of cytokines to enhance antitumor immune responses has been exploited in various strategies for the experimental treatment of cancer. These include the enhancement of host cytokine production induced nonspecifically by exposure to biologic response modifiers; direct treatment with recombinant cytokines; the use of adoptive immunotherapy, in which patient peripheral blood cells or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are exposed to cytokines and activated ex vivo, generating activated cells with antitumor effects that can then be readministered to the patient; and gene therapy-based approaches in which tumor cells are transduced with a cytokine gene, the expression of which will presumably enhance antitumor immune responses, or even by the modulation of local cytokine production induced by drugs. Also, it is important to note that the antitumor effects of cytokines might be modulated by soluble receptors or blocking factors; blocking factors for TNF and for lymphotoxin were found in ascites of patients with ovarian cancer.¹⁷.

Cytokines also can have growth-enhancing effects for tumor cells: cytokines can act as autocrine or paracrine growth factors for human cancer cells, including tumor cells of nonlymphoid origin. For instance, IL-6, which is produced by various other types of human tumor cells, can act as an autocrine growth factor for human myeloma, Kaposi sarcoma, and renal carcinoma.^18,19,20,21 Interestingly, recent studies suggest that vIL-6, the viral homologue of human IL-6 that is encoded by HHV-8, may act as a paracrine growth factor for multiple myeloma cells²² and in Castleman disease²³ in HIV-negative subjects, as well as for Kaposi sarcoma, in both HIV-positive and HIV-negative people.²⁴.

Clearly, cytokines are of great potential value in cancer treatment and also may play roles in the pathogenesis of various cancers by acting as tumor growth or viability-enhancing factors. Because of their multiple, even conflicting, biologic effects, a thorough understanding of cytokine biology will be essential for the successful use of these molecules in cancer treatment.

Tumor development has been associated with the inappropriate expression or mutation of various genes: oncogene overexpression, amplification, or mutation; tumor suppressor gene (antioncogene) expression or mutation; or cytokines and growth factors and the cellular receptors for these molecules. Subversion of host antitumor immune responses also may play a role in the development of cancer.

Cytokines and growth factors may play important roles in the development and growth of ovarian cancer; in fact, epithelial ovarian cancer may be a cytokine-propelled disease.^12,25,26,27 Cytokines, including IL-1 and IL-6, enhance the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells,^28,29 and various cytokines are produced by ovarian cancer cells, including macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-1, TNF-α, and IL-6.^30,31,32 Many ovarian cancer cells produce both M-CSF and fms, the M-CSF receptor.^{29,30,31,33,34} Levels of fms messenger RNA correlated strongly with ovarian tumors of high histologic grade and advanced clinical stage, and were associated with a poor clinical outcome.³¹ In addition, elevated plasma levels of M-CSF were seen in 70% to 80% of patients with ovarian cancer.^29,31,33 Because M-CSF-stimulated macrophages might produce other cytokines, such as IL-1 or IL-6, that can further stimulate tumor cell growth, M-CSF potentially could act as both an autocrine and paracrine tumor stimulatory factor and as a factor that can modify the host environment, resulting in enhanced tumor cell growth.³¹

Role of Interleukin-6 in the Pathogenesis of Ovarian Cancer

IL-6 is a pleiotropic growth- and differentiation-inducing factor^10,35 that acts as an autocrine and paracrine growth factor for several types of human tumors, including multiple myeloma cells,^19,36 renal cancer cells,²¹ and AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma.²⁰ IL-6 also acts as a programmed cell death-preventing factor for B-cell tumors.³⁷.

Ovarian cancer cells of epithelial origin produce and secrete variable quantities of IL-6, which is not distin-guishable from monocyte-derived and lymphoid cell-derived IL-6.¹⁸ IL-6 messenger RNA expression also indicated that most epithelial ovarian tumor cell lines show detectable levels of IL-6 gene expression.¹⁸ Several cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1, and TNF) can up-regulate IL-6 production by ovarian tumor cells.¹⁸ Primary cultures of normal human ovarian epithelium also produced IL-6.³⁸.

Elevated levels of IL-6 also have been seen in vivo in ovarian cancer; IL-6 was detected in the ascitic fluid¹⁸ and serum³⁹ of women with ovarian cancer. Ascitic fluids isolated from patients with ovarian cancer had elevated levels of IL-6.¹⁸ Elevated serum IL-6 levels were seen in ovarian cancer, and they correlated with the presence of more extensive disease.³⁹ In another study, serum levels of IL-6 in ovarian cancer patients were seen to correlate with disease-free survival time, as well as with FIGO stage.⁴⁰.

We studied the in vivo biologic effects of IL-6 by correlating levels of IL-6, acute-phase proteins (C-reactive protein [CRP], haptoglobin), and immunoglobulins (Ig) M, A, and G in the ascitic fluid or serum of patients with ovarian cancer. Significantly elevated levels of IL-6, CRP, haptoglobin, and IgA, and decreased levels of IgM were seen in ovarian cancer ascites (n = 36), compared with a control group (donors with nonmalignant gynecologic conditions, n = 20) (unpublished observations). Again, elevated serum IL-6 levels (6.5 ± 5.2 vs. .2 ± .02 U/mL) were seen in ovarian cancer (n = 7), and serum CRP levels were increased compared with levels in control subjects (n = 7). The levels of CRP in ascites correlated with IL-6 content (not shown). These results suggest that the IL-6 that is present in vivo in patients with ovarian cancer is biologically active because IL-6 can act both as a B-cell-stimulating factor, inducing the production of immunoglobulins, and as a potent inducer for the production of acute-phase reactants.^10,41,42,43 In a related study, serum levels of various cytokines, including IL-6, were examined in people with ovarian cancer; serum levels of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, sIL-2R, and CRP were significantly increased in patients compared with controls, consistent with the previously reported hypothesis that high IL-6 and/or CRP serum levels may represent an important and independent prognostic factor of the likely outcome in cancer patients.⁴⁴.

Another recent observation suggested that IL-6 can act as a growth factor for ovarian cancer cells. Culture supernatants from activated human monocytes, which support ovarian tumor growth, contained significant amounts of IL-6, and anti-IL-6 serum inhibited part of this monocyte-produced growth-supporting activity.²⁸ Therefore, IL-6 has the potential to act as a paracrine growth factor for ovarian cancer cells. We examined the possibility that IL-6 acts as an autocrine growth factor for ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting IL-6 gene expression by exposure to IL-6 antisense oligonucleotides. The result was greatly decreased cellular proliferation. Exposure of ovarian cancer cells to various concentrations of an antisense IL-6 oligodeoxynucleotide, specific for a sequence in the second coding exon of the IL-6 gene, resulted in decreased IL-6 production and a greater than 80% to 85% inhibition of cellular proliferation.⁴⁵ These results suggest that endogenous IL-6 production is needed for optimal cell growth.⁴⁴ In other work, it was seen that IL-6 enhanced the resistance of ovarian cancer cells to apoptosis induced by cytotoxic drugs.⁴⁶ Also, IL-6 expression was seen to be elevated in drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells.⁴⁷ In our own work, we saw that pretreatment of ovarian cancer cells with IL-6 resulted in decreased sensitivity to cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity.⁴⁸ Together, these results suggests that this cytokine can promote enhanced viability, and resistance to cytotoxic drugs, in ovarian cancer cells.

IL-6 also may enhance ovarian cancer cell growth indirectly, by inhibiting T cell activation. In fact, it has been seen that elevated serum levels of IL-6 and other cytokines were correlated with decreased immune cell activation.⁴⁹ Clearly, IL-6 can act as an autocrine and paracrine growth factor for ovarian cancer cells, but the complete role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer is not clear, because IL-6 has the potential to modulate antitumor immune responses.

Role of Interleukin-10 in the Pathogenesis of Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial malignancies of the ovary usually are confined to the peritoneal cavity, even in advanced stages of the disease, so it has been suggested that the growth of ovarian cancer intraperitoneally could be related to the local deficiency of antitumor immune effector mechanisms.⁵⁰ Ascitic fluid from patients with ovarian cancer contained significantly elevated levels of IL-10,⁵¹ a cytokine that originally was identified as cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor because of its activity as an inhibitor of cytokine production.⁵² IL-10, a 35- to 40-kd cytokine, is produced by the type 2 CD4⁺ helper T-cell clones (TH2), and inhibits the cytokine production of the type 1 subset (TH1). We measured the levels of various cytokines in ascites that were obtained from women with ovarian cancer and found elevated levels of various cytokines compared with the levels in peritoneal fluid from women who did not have cancer. Additionally, 50% to 60% of patients had significant ascitic levels of IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, and GM-CSF. Levels of various cytokines, including IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, G-CSF, and GM-CSF were significantly elevated (unpublished observations). A similar pattern was seen in sera from women with ovarian cancer, with IL-6 and IL-10 frequently detected.

Our preliminary results showed that ovarian cancer cells do not produce IL-10 (unpublished observations). In a recent study, it was seen that monocytes make the IL-10 seen in ovarian cancer ascites, and that such IL-10-producing monocytes inhibited T cell activation.⁵³ Overall, it appears that high levels of IL-10 may result in a peritoneal environment characterized by immune unresponsiveness, thereby promoting tumor cell growth.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is responsive to many chemotherapeutic agents, but despite improvements in surgery and chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate remains low, at approximately 20% to 30% for advanced stage disease.⁵⁴ Also, because the disease typically eludes early detection techniques, most patients present in advanced stage. Therefore, there is a great need to develop useful biologic therapies, and innovative approaches to the control of metastatic residual epithelial ovarian cancer are being sought. Ovarian cancer represents an attractive target for these therapies: the bulk of ovarian cancer occurs in the peritoneal cavity, making the regional administration of biological therapy is theoretically attractive. Patients with small-volume residual peritoneal disease are good candidates for biological therapies and immunotherapy, particularly regional peritoneal immunotherapy.^55,56 Further, patients with advanced disease are significantly immunocompromised,⁵⁷ suggesting a role for immune-enhancing therapeutic approaches.

Dysplastic cervical epithelial cells also present an attractive target for immune enhancement-based prophylactic (vaccine) and immune-based therapeutic strategies, because these cells reflect infection with an oncogenic virus (HPV). Advances in molecular biology, biotechnology, immunology, and cytokine biology have resulted in the availability of new, promising immunotherapeutic approaches for ovarian cancer. In addition to this, effective vaccines for the prevention of HPV infection have been developed.

Enhancement of Specific Immune Responses to Human Papillomavirus-Infected Cervical Epithelial Cells

HPV, more specifically a subset of HPV subtypes (HPV 16, 18, 31, and 45), has been implicated as the central etiologic agent in the majority of cervical cancers. HPV-infected dysplastic and cancerous cervical epithelial cells consistently retain and express two of the viral genes, E6 and E7, which respectively interact with, and disrupt the function of, the p53 and RB tumor suppressor gene products. Because an infectious agent (HPV) plays a clear and central role in the pathogenesis of this gynecologic cancer, opportunities exist for treatment and prevention strategies based on the enhancement of antiviral immune function, especially because it appears that factors other than infection with HPV, such as cellular immune function, play an important role in determining whether the infection of cervical epithelial cells will regress or progress to cancer. This has led to the development of prophylactic and/or therapeutic vaccines to HPV, as well as treatment approaches based on the enhancement of host immune function.^58,59,60,61 In fact, an HPV vaccine has been shown to have an exceptional level of efficacy in a recent clinical trial: an HPV-16 virus-like particle vaccine was seen to result in 100% efficacy in the reduction of the incidence of persistent HPV-16.⁶¹ All cases of HPV-16-related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia seen in this study occurred among the placebo recipients. Therefore, administration of this HPV-16 vaccine clearly reduced the incidence of both HPV-16 infection and HPV-16-related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. These findings suggest that immunization of HPV-negative women with similar vaccines, especially polyvalent vaccines providing immunity to several oncogenic HPV subtypes, will markedly reduce the incidence of cervical cancer in the future, especially in developing countries where clinical screening for cervical dysplasia is not widely available.

Immunotherapy with Biologic Response Modifiers

Most early experimental immunotherapies for metastatic ovarian cancer involved biologic response modifiers, such as Corynebacterium parvum (a heat-killed, Gram-negative anaerobic bacillus), bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), Freund's complete adjuvant, or modifications of these agents.⁶² Although initial studies with nonspecific immunotherapy, such as BCG and C. parvum, demonstrated tumor regression in some studies, these therapies did not prolong survival when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in randomized trials.⁵⁴

Monoclonal Antibodies and Immunotherapy

Monoclonal antibodies have played an important role in the detection of tumor markers; OC-125, a monoclonal antibody that is reactive with a molecule produced by epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells, is used widely to monitor blood CA-125 antigen levels.⁶³ Monoclonal antibodies can affect antitumor responses in various ways: by complement activation and tumor cell lysis, by directly inducing antiproliferative effects, by enhancing the activity of phagocytic cells, or by mediating ADCC. Also, monoclonal antibody-based therapeutic strategies can target or block the biologic function of cell surface signaling molecules.⁵⁵

Anti-HER2 Antibody

Because the HER-2/neu oncogene (HER-2) is overexpressed in many cancers, it has been suggested that the HER-2 antigen, a transmembrane protein tyrosine kinase that is homologous to the human epidermal growth factor receptor, be used as the target for immunotherapy.⁶⁴ In an experimental animal model system, a monoclonal antibody directed to HER-2 was seen to enhance human tumor cell susceptibility to TNF and cisplatin, suggesting that anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibodies could modulate the in vivo effects of HER-2/neu.⁶⁵ In fact, anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibodies, specifically, the humanized monoclonal antibody Herceptin (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), has been tested in several clinical trials and found to be an effective adjuvant therapy for HER-2-positive breast and ovarian cancer patients.^66,67 This monoclonal antibody has established itself as an active agent, in conjunction with paclitaxel chemotherapy, in relapsed breast cancer patients who express the HER2/neu protein product. HER-2 is believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer; elevated levels of this oncogene were seen in approximately one third of ovarian cancers.⁶⁸ The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has conducted phase 1/2 trials of Herceptin in ovarian cancer.⁶⁹ Among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, the rate of HER2/neu overexpression was less than 12% (i.e., lower than expected). In a trial of 41 patients, the overall response rate appears to be less than 10% (GOG data, Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2000). The drug is undergoing testing in combination with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy to determine its activity in that setting. Clearly, not all patients respond to Herceptin therapy, and many patients who initially respond have resistance within 1 year of treatment. This has led some workers to suggest that vaccination strategies that generate T cell responses to HER-2 be developed.⁶⁷

Anti-CA-125 monoclonal antibody

A recent innovative approach to immunologic cancer therapy, pioneered by researchers at AltaRex, Unither, and their collaborators, involves administration of monoclonal antibodies that target tumor-specific antigens circulating in the bloodstream, in addition to antigens on tumor cells themselves.⁷⁰ In a sense, these antibodies act as cancer vaccines (see later). Oregovomab (B43.13) is a murine monoclonal antibody to CA-125, which is seen in more than 90% of patients with late-stage ovarian cancer. This monoclonal antibody binds to circulating CA-125 antigen, resulting in the formation of immune complexes (antibody:antigen complexes) that are recognized as foreign, because these complexes include foreign (murine) antibody. These immune complexes are believed to be taken-up by antigen presenting cells, allowing the processing of the autologous CA-125 antigen, leading to induction of CA-125-specific antibodies, helper T cells, and cytolytic T cells. The antigen processing of the autologous antigen-xenotypic antibody complex is altered, relative to the processing of either component alone, and cellular and humoral immune responses directed to the tumor antigen have been demonstrated after treatment. Administered via 20-minute intravenous infusion, low-dose monoclonal antibodies such as B43.13 are better-tolerated compared with previous high-dose murine antibody approaches.

The possible therapeutic value of this low-dose monoclonal antibody approach was serendipitously discovered in a diagnostic study with B43.13, which was first developed as a tumor-imaging agent, because of its high affinity for CA-125. In a study using technetium (Tc) 99m-radiolabeled B43.13 for the immunoscintigraphic detection of recurrent ovarian cancer, it was noted that a many patients exhibited unexpectedly long survival times.^70,71,72,73.

Efforts are underway to corroborate and extend these findings by assessing the therapeutic efficacy of nonradiolabeled B43.13 in a series of prospective placebo-controlled and open-label studies in patients with ovarian cancer. The therapeutic objectives are to extend the period of disease stabilization while maintaining quality of life and to supplement surgical and chemotherapeutic approaches so that greater survival with extended quality of life is achieved. The usefulness of B43.13 is being explored in several clinical applications combined with the standard treatments of ovarian cancer either alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy. Furthermore, research characterizing the immune-altering properties of the B43.13-CA-125 murine monoclonal antibody:tumor antigen complex continues to refine the understanding of the immunobiological mechanisms involved in this therapeutic approach.^74,75,76 B43.13 has been seen to modify antigen processing of CA-125 by dendritic cells in vitro.^77,78.

B43.13 has been studied as consolidation after front-line surgery and chemotherapy, with the aim of providing immune stimulation at a time when patient disease burden is minimal. Three protocols involving more than 500 patients have been conducted in this consolidation period. Ehlen and associates recently reported on the initial results of their 342-patient randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of patients with stage III/IV disease and no evaluable disease after front-line treatment.⁷⁹ A 2-mg, 20-minute B43.13 infusion, or placebo control, was provided for three monthly treatments, and then was provided quarterly until relapse. Time to relapse, quality of life, immune response, survival, and safety are being assessed, and follow-up is ongoing. More than half of the treated patients generated a vigorous immune response, and these immune responses are significantly associated with favorable clinical outcome. These immune responses are direct humoral antibody responses to the administered antibody, including responses to the constant regions of this murine antibody (IgG1 isotype), as well as to the variable antigen binding region of these antibodies. Neither of these responses is related to the CA-125 level. For the population as a whole, a significant difference was not seen between B43.13 treatment and placebo. However, in the patient subpopulation defined by more successful responses to front-line surgery and chemotherapy, a significant advantage was seen in B43.13-treated patients. In this patient subset, the progression-free survival was 20.2 months for B43.13-treated subjects versus 10.3 months for placebo (p = .029). Overall, the ultimate impact of B43.13 treatment on chemotherapy remains unclear, and must be validated in confirmatory studies (IMPACT I and IMPACT II), which are currently underway.

Bookman and associates explored B43.13 treatment in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 55 patients with no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease but with elevated CA-125 levels (<gt>35 U/mL) after front-line therapy.⁸⁰ Patients relapsed rapidly in this clinical population, limiting the value of the study, because treatment was discontinued on clinical relapse. In a subpopulation of patients who had time to mount an immune response and had small-diameter residual disease, a trend similar to that observed in the study by Ehlen and associates⁷⁹ was noted, with a 6-month progression-free survival of 75% for the B43.13 treated group and 35% for the placebo group (p = .1).

Method and associates studied the impact of B43.13 dose frequency and schedule in patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer who had completed front-line therapy with no evidence of disease.⁸¹ This 102-patient study involved a randomization of patients into three dosing groups. While the study is ongoing, preliminary results suggest that generation of an optimal immune response requires more than two doses. However, increasing the dosing intensity to six monthly injections at initiation did not boost the frequency or magnitude of induced immunity.

Several phase 2 studies have been completed in patients with known recurrent ovarian cancer. Ehlen and associates conducted an open-label trial of 13 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with CA-125 levels exceeding 35 U/mL, multiple previous regimens of chemotherapy, and poor prognosis.⁸² This treatment was seen to induce T cell immune responses, assessed using an IFNγ ELISPOT assay. A second study,⁸³ which enrolled 20 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, assessed the clinical and immunologic effects of immunotherapy, before and concurrent with salvage chemotherapy. B43.13 treatment was well tolerated, and evidence for induction of immune responsiveness was seen, with CA-125-specific T-cell immunity seen in seven of 18 patients. Subsequent chemotherapy did not abrogate the induced immune responses, and interestingly, T-cell responses to autologous tumor increased in three patients and remained stable in the other two patients who were treated with combined chemoimmunotherapy.⁸⁴ Subjects who demonstrated T cell responses to CA-125 and/or autologous tumor showed a highly significant benefit in time to progression and survival, compared with nonresponders (p <lt> .01). The third study is a long-term follow-up of patients who underwent imaging with radiolabeled B43.13 monoclonal antibody.⁸⁵ Data from 44 patients with suspected or established recurrent disease who underwent initial antibody exposure between 1989 and 1996 were examined to assess survival times and immunologic correlates of therapeutic effects, demonstrating that B43.13 exposure was associated with prolonged survival times, which are correlated with induction of humoral responses, including human antimurine antibody responses, anti-B43.13-idiotype, and anti-CA-125.86 Together, these findings suggest that treatment with the B43.13 monoclonal antibody is safe and may have activity in the recurrent disease setting.

The use of B43.13 has not yet been studied in conjunction with front-line therapy. At first thought, it may seem that the immunosuppressive properties of front-line therapy may ablate the immunostimulatory effects of the antibody treatment. However, chemotherapy may beneficially alter the characteristics of an immune response, perhaps through selective elimination of immune suppressive lymphocyte populations.⁸⁷ The results of phase 2 studies of B43.13 in patients with recurrent disease and concurrent chemoimmunotherapy suggest that study of front-line chemoimmunotherapy should be considered.⁸⁸ Induction of CTL responses have been suggested with concomitant therapy and combination therapy did not alter neither the safety profile of B43.13 treatment, nor that of the chemotherapeutic agents tested. Therefore, study of antibody-based immunostimulation with B43.13 in conjunction with front-line treatment may be warranted.

CA-125, the ovarian cancer marker to which the B43.13 is directed, also is found in patients with other cancer types. In addition to the B43.13 monoclonal antibody, several other monoclonal antibody-based products, directed against tumor-specific antigens, are being explored in preclinical and clinical studies. Therefore, there is great potential for the development of experimental treatment strategies for the treatment of ovarian cancer with multiple antibodies specific to different tumor antigens.

Radioimmunotherapy with antipolymorphic epithelial mucin monoclonal antibody HMFG1 is a murine monoclonal antibody (IgG1 isotype) that is specific for an epitope of polymorphic epithelial mucin (PEM), which is expressed on more than 90% of epithelial ovarian cancers and many other carcinomas.⁸⁹ Phase 1/2 trials of HMFG1 monoclonal antibody radiolabeled with yttrium (Yt) 90 have shown that this agent is well tolerated when administered intraperitoneally.⁹⁰ The survival of patients with microscopic residual disease after induction chemotherapy, who received radiolabeled HMFG1, appears to be prolonged compared with historical controls.⁹¹ Antisoma has conducted a multicenter, randomized, prospective phase 3 trial of ⁹⁰yttrium-labeled HMFG1 in women with no evidence of disease used as consolidation therapy at the completion of their primary chemotherapy. We await the results of this trial.

Intraperitoneal Cytokine Therapy

The use of recombinant DNA technology has made possible the production of large quantities of cytokines. Several of these agents have been examined in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials, including recombinant human IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2.

INTERFERON-α

IFN-α and IFN-γ have been shown to be active against ovarian cancer both in vitro and in vivo.^92,93,94,95 IFN-α, which is capable of augmenting the cytotoxicity of autologous PBMC to human ovarian carcinoma cells,⁹⁶ is well-tolerated locally but has significant systemic side effects, making it an attractive candidate for intraperitoneal immunotherapy. The earliest clinical trials of IFN-α administered intraperitoneally were conducted in women with persistent ovarian cancer at second-look laparotomy.^97,98,99 Intraperitoneal IFN-α can augment NK cytotoxicity, and this was associated with tumor rejection.^100,101 However, augmentation of NK activity was not invariably associated with clinical response. The dominant mechanism that is responsible for killing tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity may involve the direct effect of IFN on cancer cells, as is seen with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, rather than the enhancement of antitumor immune responsiveness.⁵⁰ In several confirmatory second-line trials in women with minimal residual disease, the surgically documented response rates to IFN-α were 30% to 50%.^{102,103,104,105} This outcome was shown to be similar in women treated with intraperitoneal IFN-γ as second-line therapy,^{106,107,108,109} with surgically documented responses in the range of 30% to 45% in patients with minimal residual disease. Although there is in vitro evidence that IFN-γ can increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to cisplatin,⁹³ second-line intraperitoneal IFN-α in combination with cisplatin does not appear to offer any advantage to interferon alone in these patients.^102,103 Adverse effects, such as lethargy, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms, are common with the administration of the interferons.

INTERFERON-γ

Despite these results for second-line administration of interferon in which response rates comparable with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents were reported, the use of interferon in ovarian cancer has been limited to clinical trials. However, in a randomized phase 3 trial, Windbichler and colleagues¹¹⁰ demonstrated that the use of subcutaneous IFN-γ in women receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer was well-tolerated. As one would expect with the administration of an interferon, a higher proportion of patients had fever and flu-like syndrome. However, there was no appreciable increase in gastrointestinal, neurological, or hematological toxic effects. Importantly, the results demonstrated a higher response rate and longer disease progression-free survival in women receiving IFN-γ plus chemotherapy than women who were treated with chemotherapy alone. The improved progression-free survival was seen in both optimally resected patients (as defined with residual maximum tumor dimension of less than 2 centimeters) and those with bulky residual disease (greater than 2 centimeters). No statistically significant improvement in overall survival was observed. In those patients, the benefit only appeared to exist in those who had minimal residual disease (i.e., patients whose residual disease was no greater than 5 mm in maximum diameter). In the randomized, prospective trial, the IFN-γ was administered as a primary treatment, presumably before the development of drug resistance. Although this represents the first trial of its kind, one of the limitations of the trial is that the chemotherapy used was a combination of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide. These drugs have now been supplanted by drugs that appear to be more efficacious and less toxic (e.g., carboplatin and paclitaxel). The use of IFN-γ added to current treatment regimens needs to be explored in a comparative trial to determine whether it would also have a similar advantage when combined with those agents.

Although a mechanism of action of the effects mediated by IFN-γ in patients with ovarian cancer is unknown, it has been speculated that this cytokine may inhibit the expression of dysregulated oncogenes (e.g., HER-2/neu), improving the response of cisplatin-resistant cells. Overall, evidence for this is mixed.^111,112,113 Cytokine administration intraperitoneally appears to be necessary to augment local cytotoxic effector cells, which are located where most of the residual cancer occurs. Presumably, direct contact with the cytokine through regional administration is necessary to induce cytostatic and/or cytotoxic effects in the peritoneal cavity. However, in the randomized trial by Windbichler and associates, systemic administration conferred the survival benefit. Most likely, one should attribute this to the stimulatory effects of IFN-γ on cells of the immune system, including stimulation of NK cells and macrophages, both of which are known to have the ability to exert antitumor effects.⁹⁹ The stimulation of macrophages and other cytotoxic effector cells may have a nonspecific immunomodulatory effect in these patients, which favors responsiveness to chemotherapy or exert direct antitumor effects.

Intriguingly, the interferons, including IFN-γ, have been shown to have not only an antiproliferative effect but also antiangiogenic effects. Theoretically, these cytokines have their highest probability of success in women who are also subjected to chemotherapy for their disease. The combination of agents, such as IFN-γ, thalidomide or anti-VEGF, and cytotoxic therapy presents a new opportunity for the development of innovative pharmacologic agents in solid tumors. The combination of interferon, and other related cytokines, with cytotoxic therapy should be further explored in phase 2 and 3 trials conducted in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR

In various preclinical studies, TNF-α showed significant antineoplastic activity to a variety of malignant cell lines.^114,115,116 However, in phase 1 trials of TNF-α delivered systemically, there was limited clinical activity with considerable systemic toxicity, especially fevers, rigors, and hypotension.^{117,118,119,120} As with other cytokines and biologic response modifiers, it had been hoped that intraperitoneal TNF would produce an increased antitumor response and fewer systemic side effects. In a phase 1 trial, recombinant human TNF-α was administered safely when given intraperitoneally, with a marked pharmacokinetic advantage for intraperitoneal administration compared with systemic administration.¹²¹ Although TNF-α was not detectable in plasma, patients experienced mild emesis, temperature elevations, and chills, even with intraperitoneal TNF-α doses as low as 10 mg/m². Only one patient had a hypotensive episode (blood pressure 80/50 mmHg), but treatment-related abdominal pain was common. No clinical responses were observed in this phase 1 trial.¹²¹.

In another study, intraperitoneal recombinant human TNF-α was used to control the formation of malignant ascites, and was shown to have a potential role in the management of this process.¹²² Thirty-two patients with symptomatic malignant ascites were treated with a weekly infusion of TNF-α (80 mg/m²). Twenty patients had ovarian cancer; the remaining 12 had various nonovarian malignancies. Of the 31 evaluable patients, 17 (55%) experienced complete resolution of ascites 30 days after the initiation of therapy, and 14 patients exhibited partial control of malignant ascites. Interestingly, only one patient had a relapse during the follow-up period of approximately 8 months. The most significant side effects were fever, chills, abdominal pain, and emesis.¹²² On the basis of this report, this treatment may be an option for patients with malignant ascites when alternative therapies have been ineffective. Further studies of intraperitoneal TNF-α for the control of malignant ascites would be needed to confirm this.

The potential of TNF-α to augment the antitumor effect of a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent (cisplatin) offers another potential immunotherapeutic strategy. Even low doses of TNF-α can augment the antitumor properties of drugs such as cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in vitro.¹¹⁸ Therefore, the use of low-dose TNF-α therapy, administered in conjunction with cytotoxic chemotherapy, could offer a therapeutic advantage and minimize the toxicity of TNF-α immunotherapy.

INTERLEUKIN-2

IL-2 also has been used for systemic experimental immunotherapy. In an early study, recombinant human IL-2, administered intravenously to patients with progressive melanoma, renal, colon or ovarian cancer, was seen to induce lymphocytosis, increased numbers of cells expressing the IL-2 receptor, detectable circulating IL-2-activated killer (LAK) cells, and augmented NK cytotoxicity.¹²³ The intraperitoneal administration of IL-2 has been the subject of several studies.^124,125 The major rationale for developing intraperitoneal-based IL-2 treatment strategies is the observation that the in vitro antitumor activity of IL-2 is enhanced with increasing drug concentrations.^123,126 When the intraperitoneal administration of IL-2 was tested, a major pharmacokinetic advantage for intracavity IL-2 treatment was observed, as expected.^124,125 In a phase 1/2 study of intraperitoneal IL-2 in refractory ovarian cancer, 2 of 13 patients had a complete response.¹²⁶ Systemic toxicities were mild and included fever, fatigue, myalgias, diarrhea, emesis, and abdominal pain. In a phase 1 trial, administration of IL-2 intraperitoneally resulted in a 100-fold increase in peritoneal cavity exposure, compared with systemic administration.¹²⁷

Induction of Local Cytokine Production by Paclitaxel

Paclitaxel is an important drug in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Although paclitaxel is known to have biologic effects that can inhibit tumor cell growth directly, such as stabilizing microtubules and blocking cell mitosis, it has been seen that the effectiveness of this drug in ovarian cancer exceeds that of other antimitotic chemotherapeutic agents. This has been taken to suggest that paclitaxel may have additional, perhaps indirect, modes of action. Proinflammatory cytokine gene expression was examined in a series of cell lines and tumor explants from human ovarian cancer tissue; paclitaxel was seen to induce the secretion of IL-8, but not IL-6 or IL-1.¹²⁸ In this study, paclitaxel was not seen to induce IL-8 in breast carcinoma, endometrial stromal, or T-lymphocyte or monocyte cultures. These results suggest that the expression of this chemokine in vivo, induced by paclitaxel, may enhance local antitumor host immune responses, by inducing the transcription of cytokine and/or growth factor genes in ovarian cancer cells. Subsequent studies led to the identification of paclitaxel-responsive regulatory elements in the IL-8 promoter; the AP-1 and NF-kB binding sites in the IL-8 promoter were seen to be required for the induction of IL-8 gene expression, whereas a C/EBP site required for IL-8 promoter activation in other cell types was not involved.¹²⁹ Watson and associates¹³⁰ identified the region of paclitaxel responsible for the induction of IL-8 in ovarian cancer cells and found a direct correlation between the ability to induce IL-8 production and cytotoxicity-analogues that most markedly up-regulated IL-8 expression proved to be the most cytotoxic. However, it is not known whether any of the in vivo therapeutic effects of paclitaxel treatment are caused by the induction of inflammatory cytokine production and/or to the enhancement of antitumor immune responses by paclitaxel-induced cytokines.

Adoptive Immunotherapy

Experimental adoptive immunotherapy involving the ex vivo enhancement of antitumor immune cell responses provided an immune system-based approach for antitumor therapy.^{131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138} In particular, adoptive immunotherapy involving the infusion of autologous LAK cells has been studied extensively, and has produced tumor regression in various animal and human tumors.¹³¹ Exposure of PBMC to IL-2 leads to the generation of cytotoxic effect cells (LAK cells), which are cytotoxic for a variety of tumor cells, including tumor cells that are resistant to NK-cell-meditated or T-lymphocyte-mediated lysis. Experimental treatment of human subjects with autologous, ex vivo-generated LAK cells and IL-2 has yielded some responses.^{55,131,132,133,134,135} However, the overall response rate to LAK treatment is low, and this type of adoptive immunotherapy can result in significant morbidity. Therefore, it is impractical in most medical settings.¹³⁶ Other, more efficient and practical applications of adoptive immunotherapy are under development. One approach involves the ex vivo generation of immune effector cells from TIL, by their activation and expansion in vitro by exposure to IL-2, and administration of ex vivo-activated TIL concurrently with IL-2.^137,138.

Systemic IL-2 administration in various forms of human cancer, with or without LAK cells or TIL, has been the subject of intense investigation.^{133,134,135,136,137,138}In vivo preclinical studies have shown that treatment with LAK cells plus IL-2 can prolong survival significantly.^{139,140,141,142} In a phase 1 trial, IL-2 and LAK cells were administered intraperitoneally after systemic administration of IL-2.^127,143 While administration of IL-2 intraperitoneally resulted in a 100-fold increase in peritoneal cavity exposure, compared with systemic administration, and LAK activity was detectable in the peritoneal cavity during the period of treatment, considerable toxicity was seen, including fever, chills, emesis, hypotension, abdominal pain, fluid retention, bone marrow suppression, and liver function abnormalities. Infection also was common. Several patients had extensive peritoneal cavity fibrosis, possibly resulting from the release by IL-2-activated cells of various growth factors and cytokines capable of stimulating collagen synthesis by fibroblasts.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte immunotherapy has been studied in ovarian cancer. In seven patients with advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with the adoptive transfer of TIL after a single dose of cyclophosphamide, one complete response and four partial responses were seen.¹⁴⁴ Ten additional patients were treated with a cisplatin-containing chemotherapeutic regimen as well as TIL. Seven complete responses and two partial responses were seen. Four of the seven patients who had a complete response had no recurrence after 15 months of follow-up. These results suggest that TIL-based immunotherapy for ovarian cancer may achieve complete response rates without IL-2 administration. Thus, this use of TIL may prove to be a more appropriate form of adoptive immunotherapy for ovarian cancer than LAK-based regimens. Further studies are needed to examine TIL and other forms of adoptive immunotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Intraperitoneal Gene Therapy

In recent years, gene therapy-based approaches to the treatment of gynecologic malignancies have gained significant attention, as more has been learned about the molecular basis of these cancers, allowing for potential interventions at the molecular level for therapeutic purposes. Some potential gene therapy approaches involve the expression of cytokine genes, or other genes associated with the enhancement of antitumor immune responses (genetic immunopotentiation), while other approaches aim to target dysfunctional oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes (mutation compensation), or to deliver molecular chemotherapy.^{70,145,146,147,148,149,150} However, significant problems will need to be solved before gene therapy for cancer can be effective and practical, including limitations in the ability to deliver therapeutic genes at a sufficiently high level, and with specificity, into tumor cells. Certainly, much new information on the potential of gene therapy for gynecologic cancers will result from ongoing studies.

Various components of the immune system can exert effective antitumor responses, including direct cytotoxicity directed against tumor cells as well as the production of cytotoxic or immune-enhancing cytokines. The dysregulated expression of various genes, including overexpression of oncogenes, mutation or loss of anti-oncogenes, and overproduction of growth factor and cytokines, may play an important role in the development and progression of ovarian cancer. Modification of the host environment and host antitumor immune responses also may contribute to the development and growth of ovarian malignancies. Understanding the specific mechanisms that are involved in the development and growth of ovarian cancer will provide opportunities for the rational design of effective antitumor treatment, including immunotherapy.

Several forms of experimental immunotherapy for ovarian cancer have been examined, including biologic response modifiers and cytokines. Preliminary studies show that immune enhancement and antitumor effects that lead to tumor rejection are most likely to occur when relatively high concentrations of cytokines are brought into direct contact with tumors and when the tumor burden is minimal, such as in an adjuvant setting or when treatment is combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Therefore, intraperitoneal immunotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, may provide effective new forms of treatment for ovarian cancer. Great advances have been made, in recent years, in the generation of appropriate forms of monoclonal antibodies, directed to cell-surface molecules expressed on tumor cells. This has resulted in a renaissance of monoclonal antibody-based therapies for several forms of human cancer. Adoptive immunotherapy also has created new opportunities for the use of immunotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer. Of great long-term importance, gene therapy holds the promise of novel and targeted therapeutic approaches based on an increasing understanding of the molecular and cellular biology of cancer and anticancer immune responses, although significant practical problems will need to be solved before gene therapy for cancer can be effective and widespread.

Immunologic therapy of ovarian cancer currently remains experimental. Immunological therapies appear to augment what can be accomplished with optimal chemotherapy and thus could provide an incremental improvement in patient management over current standards when results of currently ongoing studies establish definitive treatments as a standard of care. Clearly, we are in a period of rapid scientific and technological progress, which is resulting in the development and testing of various cytokine-based and immune-based therapies for gynecologic cancers.

1. Burnet FM: The concept of immunologic surveillance. Prog Exp Tumor Res 13:1, 1970

2. Male D, Roitt I: Introduction to the immune system, in Immunology. pp 1-12, 5th ed.. Mosby, London, 1998

3. Martinez-Maza Martínez-Maza O: HIV-induced immune dysfunction and AIDS-associated neoplasms. In: Mitchell MS (ed): Biological Approaches to Cancer Treatment: Biomodulation. p 181, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1993

4. Rook G, Balkwill F: Cell-mediated immune reactions. In: Roitt I, Borstoff J, Male D, (eds): Immunology. pp 131-138, 5th ed.. London, Mosby, 1998

5. Owen M: T-cell receptors and MHC molecules. In: Roitt I, Borstoff J, Male D, (eds): Immunology. pp 83-92, 5th ed.. London, Mosby, 1998

6. Boyer CM, Knapp RC, Bast RC: Immunology and immunotherapy. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF, (eds): Practical Gynecologic Oncology. p 73, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1989

7. Ettenson D, Sheldon K, Marks A et al: Comparison of growth inhibition of a human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line by free monoclonal antibodies and their corresponding antibody-recombinant ricin A chain immunotoxins. Anticancer Res 8:833, 1988

8. Banchereau J, Steinman RM: Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392:245-252, 1998

9. Ortaldo JR, Herberman RB: Heterogeneity of natural killer cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2:359, 1984

10. Taga T, Kishimoto T: Gp130 and the interleukin-6 family of cytokines. Ann Review Immunol 15:797-818, 1997

11. Moore PS, Boshoff C, Weiss RA et al: Molecular mimicry of human cytokine and cytokine response pathway genes by KSHV. Science 274:1739-1744, 1996

12. Martínez-Maza O: Interleukin 6: Role in the pathogenesis if cancer. In: Kresina TF, (ed): Immune Modulating Agents. pp 345-362, New York, Marcel Dekker, 1998

13. Mulé JJ, McIntosh JK, Jablons DM et al: Antitumor activity of recombinant interleukin 6 in mice. J Exp Med 171:629, 1990

14. Shrader JW: The panspecific hemopoitin of activated T lymphocytes (interleukin-3). Annu Rev Immunol 4:205, 1986

15. Zlotnik A, Moore KW: Interleukin 10. Cytokine 3:366, 1991

16. Trinchieri G, Scott P: Interleukin-12: Basic principles and clinical applications. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 238:57-78, 1999

17. Cappuccini F, Yamamoto RS, DiSaia PJ et al: Identification of tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin blocking factor(s) in the ascites of patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. Lymphokine Cytokine Res 10:225, 1991

18. Watson J, Sensintaffar JL, Berek JS et al: Constitutive production of interleukin 6 by ovarian cancer cell lines and by primary ovarian tumor cultures. Cancer Res 50:6959, 1990

19. Kawano M, Hirano T, Matsuda T et al: Autocrine generation and requirement of BSF-2/IL-6 for human multiple myelomas. Nature 332:83, 1988

20. Miles SA, Rezai AR, Salazar-Gonzalez JF et al: AIDS Kaposi's sarcoma-derived cells produce and respond to interleukin-6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4068, 1990

21. Miki S, Iwano M, Miki Y et al: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) functions as an in vitro autocrine growth factor in renal cell carcinomas. FEBS Lett 250:607, 1989

22. Rettig MB, Ma HJ, Vescio RA et al: Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection of bone marrow dendritic cells from multiple myeloma patients. Science 276:1851-1854, 1997

23. Parravinci C, Corbellino M, Paulli M et al: Expression of a virus-derived cytokine, KSHV vIL-6, in HIV-seronegative Castleman's disease. Am J Pathol 151:1517-1522, 1997

24. Chang Y, Moore PS: Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)-associated herpesvirus and its role in KS. Infect Agents Dis 5:215-222, 1996

25. Malik S, Balkwill F: Epithelial ovarian cancer: A cytokine propelled disease? Br J Cancer 64:617, 1991

26. Mills GB, Hashimoto S, Hurteau J et al: Regulation of growth of human ovarian cancer cells. In: Sharp F, Mason WP, Creasman W, (eds): Ovarian Cancer 2: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management. p 127, London, Chapman & Hall, 1992

27. Malik STA, Naylor MS, Balkwill FR: Cytokines and ovarian cancer. In: Sharp F, Mason WP, Creasman W, (eds): Ovarian Cancer 2: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management. p 87, London, Chapman & Hall, 1992

28. Wu S, Rodabaugh K, Watson JM et al: Stimulation of ovarian tumor cell proliferation with monocyte products including IL-1-alpha, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:997, 1992

29. Bast RC, Xu FJ, Rodriguez GC et al: Factors regulating the growth of normal and malignant ovarian epithelium. In: Sharp F, Mason WP, Creasman W, (eds): Ovarian Cancer 2: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management. p 61, London, Chapman & Hall, 1992

30. Carson LF, Moradi MM, Li B-Y et al: Characterization of cytokines produced by ovarian cancer cells. In: Sharp F, Mason WP, Creasman W, (eds): Ovarian Cancer 2: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management. p 93, London, Chapman & Hall, 1992

31. Kacinsky BM: CSF-1 and its receptor on ovarian and other gynaecological neoplasms. In: Sharp F, Mason WP, Creasman W, (eds): Ovarian Cancer 2: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management. p 115, London, Chapman & Hall, 1992

32. Berek JS, Watson JM, Martinez-Maza O: Role of interleukin-6 in ovarian cancer. In: Sharp F, Mason WP, Creasman, (eds): Ovarian Cancer 2: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management. p 101, London, Chapman & Hall, 1992

33. Kacinsky BM, Carter D, Mittal K et al: Ovarian adenocarcinomas express fms-complementary transcripts and fms antigen, often with co-expression of CSF-1. Am J Pathol 137:135, 1990

34. Ramakrishnan S, Xu FJ, Brandt SJ et al: Constitutive production of macrophage colony-stimulating factor by human ovarian and breast cancer cell lines. J Clin Invest 83:921, 1989

35. Kishimoto T, Hirano T: Molecular regulation of B lymphocyte response. Annu Rev Immunol 6:485, 1988

36. Klein B, Zhang X-G, Jourdan M et al: Paracrine rather than autocrine regulation of myeloma-cell growth and differentiation by interleukin-6. Blood 73:517, 1989

37. Sabourin LA, Hawley RG: Suppression of programmed death and G1 arrest in B-cell hybridomas by interleukin-6 is not accompanied by altered expression of immediate early response genes. J Cell Physiol 145:564, 1990

38. Lidor YJ, Xu FJ, Martínez-Maza O et al: Constitutive production of macrophage colony stimulating factor and interleukin-6 by human ovarian surface epithelial cells. Exp Cell Res 207:332, 1993

39. Berek JS, Chung C, Kaldi K et al: Serum IL-6 levels correlate with disease status in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1038, 1991

40. Tempfer C, Zeisler H, Sliutz G et al: Serum evaluation of interleukin 6 in ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 66:27, 1997

41. Marinkovic S, Jahreis GP, Wong GG et al: IL-6 modulates the synthesis of a specific set of acute phase plasma proteins in vivo. J Immunol 142:808, 1989

42. Tosato G, Seamon KB, Goldman ND et al: Identification of a monocyte-derived human B cell growth factor as interferon-b2 (BSF-2, IL-6). Science 239:502, 1988

43. Stenson R, Watson JM, Korzeniowski PA et al: Generation, characterization and growth in nude mice of two ovarian tumor cell lines. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation. Irvine, CA, 1991

44. Macciò A, Lai P, Santona MC et al: High serum levels of soluble IL-2 receptor, cytokines, and C reactive protein correlate with impairment of T cell response in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 69:248-252, 1998

45. Watson JM, Berek JS, Martínez-Maza O: Growth inhibition of ovarian cancer cells induced by antisense IL-6 oligonucleotides. Gynecol Oncol 49:8, 1993

46. Ishioka S, van Haaften-Day C, Sagae S, Kudo R, Hacker NF: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) does not change the expression of Bcl-2 protein in the prevention of cisplatin-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cell lines. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 25:23, 1999

47. Duan Z, Feller AJ, Penson RT et al: Discovery of differentially expressed genes associated with paclitaxel resistance using cDNA array technology: analysis of interleukin (IL) 6, IL-8, and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 in the paclitaxel-resistant phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 5:3445, 1999

48. Eskandari N, Gage J, Johnson MT et al: Cytokine-mediated modulation of cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cells. Obstet Gynecol 97:S2, 2001

49. Maccio A, Lai P, Santona MC et al: High serum levels of soluble IL-2 receptor, cytokines, and C reactive protein correlate with impairment of T cell response in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 69:248, 1998

50. Berek JS, Cantrell JL, Lichtenstein AK et al: Immunotherapy with biochemically dissociated fractions of proprionebacterium acnes in a murine ovarian cancer model. Cancer Res 44:1871, 1984

51. Gotlieb WH, Abrams JS, Watson JM et al: Presence of IL-10 in the ascites of patients with ovarian and other intra-abdominal cancers. Cytokine 4:385, 1992

52. Fiorentino DF, Bond MW, Mosmann TR: Two types of mouse helper T cell, part IV. Th2 clones secrete a factor that inhibits cytokine production by Th1 clones J Exp Med 170:2081, 1989

53. Loercher AE, Nash MA, Kavanagh JJ et al: Identification of an IL-10-producing HLA-DR-negative monocyte subset in the malignant ascites of patients with ovarian carcinoma that inhibits cytokine protein expression and proliferation of autologous T cells. J Immunol 163:6251, 1999

54. Berek JS: Epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF, (eds): Practical Gynecologic Oncology. pp 457-522, 3rd ed.. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000

55. Bookman MA: Biological therapy of ovarian cancer: Curr Directions. Semin Oncol 25:381-396, 1998

56. Bookman MA, Berek JS: Biologic and immunologic therapy of ovarian cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 6:941, 1992

57. Khoo SK, MacKay EV: Immunologic reactivity of female patients with genital cancer: Status in preinvasive, locally invasive and disseminated disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 118:1018, 1974

58. van Driel WJ, Ressing ME, Brandt RM et al: The current status of therapeutic HPV vaccine. Ann Med 28:471-477, 1996

59. Gurski KJ, Steller MA: Progress and prospects in vaccine therapy for gynecologic cancers. Oncology 11:1727-1740, 1997

60. Lowy DR, Schiller JT: Papillomaviruses and cervical cancer: Pathogenesis and vaccine development. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 23:27-30, 1998

61. Koutsky LA, Ault KA, Wheeler CM et al: Proof of Principle Study Investigators: A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med 347:1645, 2002

62. Muruhata RI, Cantrell J, Lichtenstein A et al: Disassociation of biological activities of Corynebacterium parvum by chemical fractionation. Int J Immunopharmacol 2:47, 1980

63. Bast RC, Klug TL, St John E et al: A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 309:883, 1983

64. Fendly BM, Kolts C, Vetterlein D et al: The extracellular domain of HER2/neu is a potential immunogen for active specific immunotherapy of breast cancer. J Biol Response Modifiers 9:449, 1990

65. Shepard HM, Lewis GD, Sarup JC et al: Monoclonal antibody therapy of human cancer: Taking the HER2 protooncogene to the clinic. J Clin Immunol 11:117, 1991

66. Pegram MD, Lipton A, Hayes DF et al: Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. J Clin Oncol 16:2659-2671, 1998

67. Kiessling R, Weil WZ, Herrmann F et al: Cellular immunity to the Her-2/neu protooncogene. Adv Cancer Res 85:101, 2002

68. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA et al: Studies of HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science 244:707, 1989

69. Bookman MA, Darcy KM, Clarke-Pearson D et al: Evaluation of monoclonal humanized anti-HER2 antibody, trastuzumab, in patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma with overexpression of HER2: a phase II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 21:283-290, 2003

70. Berek JS, Schultes BC, Nicodemus C: Biologic and immunologic therapies for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:(10S):168-174, 2003

71. Schultes BC, Baum RP, Niesen A et al: Anti-idiotype induction therapy: Anti-CA125 antibody (Ab3) mediated tumor killing in patients treated with OvaRex MAb B43.13 (Ab1) Cancer Immunol Immunother 46:201, 1998

72. Baum RP, Noujaim AA, Nanci A et al: Clinical course of ovarian cancer patients under repeated stimulation of HAMA using MAb OC125 and B43.13 Hybridoma 12:583, 1993

73. Noujaim AA, Baum RP, Sykes TR et al: Monoclonal antibody B43.13 for immunoscintigraphy and immunotherapy of ovarian cancer. In: Klapdor R (ed): Current Tumor Diagnosis: Applications, Clinical Relevance, Trends. pp 823, München, Germany, W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 1994

74. Nicodemus CF, Schultes BC, Hamilton BL: Immunomodulation with antibodies: clinical application in ovarian cancer and other malignancies. Expert Rev Vaccines 1:35, 2002

75. Schultes BC, Zhang C, Xue LY et al: Immunotherapy of human ovarian carcinoma with OvaRex MAb B43.13 in a human-PBL-SCID/BG mouse model Hybridoma 18:47, 1999

76. Qi W, Liu D, Xu D et al: Factors to consider in antibody based immunotherapy of cancer. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 41:290, 2000

77. Berlyn KA, Schultes BC, Leveugle B et al: Generation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte responses by dendritic cells armed with PSA/anti-PSA (antigen:antibody) complexes. Clin Immunol 20:313, 2001

78. Schultes BS, Agopsowicz K, Kuzma M et al: Antibody-antigen immune complexes allow for efficient MHC class I and II-restricted antigen presentation and maturation of dendritic cells: A novel strategy for cancer chemotherapy. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 42:276, 2001

79. Ehlen TG, Gordon AN, Fingert HJ et al: Adjuvant treatment with monoclonal antibody, OvaRex MAb B43.13 (OV) targeting CA125, induces robust immune responses associated with prolonged time to relapse (TTR) in a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:9a, 2002

80. Bookman M, Rettenmaier M, Gordon A et al: Monoclonal antibody (Oregovomab) targeting of CA125 in patients (Pts) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and elevated CA125 after response to initial therapy. Clin Cancer Res 7:3756s, 2001

81. Method MW, Gordon A, Finkler N et al: Randomized evaluation of 3 treatment schedules to optimize clinical activity of OvaRex MAb B43.13 (OV) in patients (pts) with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:21a, 2002

82. Ehlen T, Whiteside T, Schultes B et al: Induction of tumor protective immunity utilizing the CA125-specific monoclonal OvaRex MAb B43.13 in a cohort of patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 80:310, 2001;Available at: www.sgo.org/meetings/32ndannual/abstracts/abstract.asp?abstractid=135.

83. Gordon A, Whiteside T, Nicodemus C et al: An interim assessment of OvaRex MAb B43.13 in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:187b, 2001

84. Schultes BC, Gordon A, Ehlen T et al: Induction of tumor- and CA125-specific T cell responses in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with OvaRex MAb B43.13 Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 43:144, 2002

85. Bolle M, Nissen A, Korz W et al: Possible role of anti-CA125 monoclonal antibody B43.13 (OvaRex) administration in long-term survival of relapsed ovarian cancer patients Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:476a, 2000 (abstr 1876)

86. Möbus VJ, Baum RP, Bolle M et al: Immune Responses to MAb B43.13 correlate with prolonged survival of women with recurrent ovarian cancer Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:28, 2003

87. Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF et al: Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 18:1, 2002

88. Gordon AN, Stringer A, Edwards RP: Clinical and immunologic outcomes of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with OvaRex MAb and chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 84:501, 2002

89. Taylor-Papadimitriou J: Monoclonal antibodies to epithelium-specific components of the human milk fat globule membrane: production and reaction with cells in culture. Int J Cancer 68:403, 1993

90. Hird V, Maraveyas A, Snook D et al: Adjuvant therapy of ovarian cancer with radioactive monoclonal antibody. Br J Cancer 68:403, 1993

91. Nicholson S, Gooden CS, Hird V et al: Radioimmunotherapy after chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a matched analysis. Oncol Reports 5:223, 1998

92. Allavena P, Peccatori F, Maggioni D et al: Intraperitoneal recombinant γ-interferon in patients with recurrent ascitic ovarian carcinoma: modulation of cytotoxicity and cytokine production in tumor-associated effectors and of major histocompatibility antigen expression on tumor cells. Cancer Res 50:7318, 1990

93. Nehme A, Julia AM, Jozan S et al: Modulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity by human recombinant interferon-gamma in human ovarian cancer cell lines. Eur J Cancer 30A:550, 1994

94. Saito T, Berens ME, Welander CE: Direct and indirect effects of human recombinant gamma-interferon on tumor cells in a clonogenic assay. Cancer Res 46:1142-1147, 1986

95. Markman M, Berek JS: Intraperitoneal administration of the biologic agents tumor necrosis factor, gamma-interferon and interleukin-2. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2:(S1):304, 1993

96. Zighelboim J, Nio Y, Berek JS et al: Immunologic control of ovarian cancer. Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul 7:216, 1988

97. Berek JS, Hacker NF, Lichtenstein A et al: Intraperitoneal recombinant α-interferon for “salvage” immunotherapy in stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Res 45:4447, 1985

98. Berek JS: Intraperitoneal adoptive immunotherapy for peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:1610, 1990

99. Berek JS: Intraperitoneal immunotherapy for ovarian cancer with alpha interferon. Eur J Cancer 28A:718, 1992

100. Berek JS, Lichtenstein AK, Knox RM et al: Synergistic effects of combination sequential immunotherapies in a murine ovarian cancer model. Cancer Res 45:4215, 1985

101. Lichtenstein AK, Spina C, Berek JS et al: Intraperitoneal administration of human recombinant alpha-interferon in patients with ovarian cancer: Effects on lymphocytes, phenotype, and cytotoxicity. Cancer Res 48:5853, 1988

102. Berek JS, Welander C, Schink JC et al: A phase I-II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and α-interferon in patients with persistent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 40:237, 1991

103. Berek JS, Markman M, Stonebraker B et al: Intraperitoneal interferon-α in residual ovarian carcinoma: A phase II Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 75:10, 1999

104. Nardi M, Cognetti F, Pollera CF: Intraperitoneal recombinant alpha 2-interferon alternating with cisplatin as salvage therapy for minimal residual disease ovarian cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 8:1036, 1991

105. Willemse PHB, deVries EGE, Mulder NH: Intraperitoneal human recombinant interferon alpha-2b in minimal residual ovarian cancer. Eur J Clin Oncol 26:353, 1991

106. D'Acquisto R, Markman M, Hakes T et al: A phase I trial of intraperitoneal recombinant gamma-interferon in advanced ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 6:689, 1988

107. Welander LM, Homesley HD, Reich SD et al: A phase II study of the efficacy of recombinant interferon gamma in relapsing ovarian adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 11:465, 1988

108. Pujade-Lauraine E, Guastalla JP, Colombo N et al: Intraperitoneal recombinant interferon gamma in ovarian cancer patients with residual disease at second look laparotomy. J Clin Oncol 14:343, 1996

109. Colombo N, Peccatori F, Paganin C et al: Anti-tumor and immunomodulatory activity of intraperitoneal IFN-gamma in ovarian carcinoma patients with minimal residual tumor after chemotherapy. Int J Cancer 51:42, 1992

110. Windbichler G, Hausmaninger H, Stummvoll W et al: Interferon-gamma in the first-line therapy of ovarian cancer: a randomized phase III trial. Br J Cancer 82:1138, 2000

111. Marth C, Muller-Holzner E, Greiter E et al: γ-interferon reduces expression of the protooncogen c-erbB-2 in human ovarian carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 50:7037, 1990

112. Marth C, Zeimet AG, Herold M et al: Different effects of interferons, interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α in normal (OSE) and malignant human ovarian epithelial cells. Int J Cancer 67:826, 1996

113. Marth C, Widschwendter M, Kaern J et al: Cisplatin resistance is associated with reduced interferon-γ-sensitivity and increased HER-2 expression in cultured ovarian cancer cells. Br J Cancer 76:1328, 1997

114. Bonavida B, Tsuchitani T, Zighelboim J et al: Synergy is documented in vitro with low-dose tumor necrosis factor, cisplatin, and doxorubicin in ovarian tumor cells. Gynecol Oncol 38:333, 1990

115. Oettgen HF, Old LJ: Tumor necrosis factor. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, (eds): Important Advances in Oncology. p 105, Philadelphia, JB, Lippincott, 1987

116. Old LJ: Tumor necrosis factor. Science 230:630, 1985

117. Chapman PB, Lester TS, Casper ES et al: Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 5:1842, 1987

118. Creagan ET, Kovach JS, Moertel CG et al: A phase I clinical trial of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor. Cancer 62:2467, 1988

119. Feinberg B, Kurzrock R, Talpaz M et al: A phase I trial of intravenously administered recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 6:1328, 1988

120. Spriggs DR, Sherman ML, Michie H: Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor administered as a 24-hr intravenous infusion: A phase I and pharmacologic study. J Natl Cancer Inst 80:1039, 1988

121. Markman M, Ianotti N, Hakes T et al: Phase I trial of intraperitoneal recombinant tumor necrosis factor. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 8:64, 1989

122. Raeth U: Phase II trial of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor alpha in patients with malignant ascites from ovarian carcinomas and non-ovarian tumors with intraperitoneal spread. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 10:187, 1991

123. Thompson JA, Lee DJ, Lindgren CG et al: Influence of dose and duration of infusion of interleukin-2 on toxicity and immunomodulation. J Clin Oncol 6:669, 1988

124. Chapman PB: A phase I trial of intraperitoneal recombinant interleukin-2 in patients with ovarian cancer. Invest New Drugs 6:179, 1988

125. Markman M, Reichman B, Hakes T et al: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer. Cancer 71:1565-1570, 1993

126. Mulé JJ, McIntosh JK, Jablons DM et al: Antitumor activity of recombinant interleukin 6 in mice. J Exp Med 171:629-636, 1990

127. Urba W, Steis RG, Bookman MA et al: Intraperitoneal lymphokine-activated killer cell/interleukin-2 therapy in patients with intra-abdominal cancer: Immunologic considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:602, 1989

128. Lee LF, Schuerer-Maly CC, Lofquist AK et al: Taxol-dependent transcriptional activation of IL-8 expression in a subset of human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 56:1303-1308, 1996

129. Lee LF, Haskill JS, Mukaida N et al: Identification of tumor-specific paclitaxel (Taxol)-responsive regulatory elements in the interleukin-8 promoter. Mol Cell Biol 17:5097-5105, 1997

130. Watson JM, Kingston DG, Chordia MD et al: Identification of the structural region of taxol that may be responsible for cytokine gene induction and cytotoxicity in human ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 41:391-397, 1998

131. Rosenberg SA: Immunotherapy of cancer by systemic administration of lymphoid cells plus interleukin-2. J Biol Response Modifiers 3:501, 1984

132. Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT: Cancer immunotherapy using interleukin-2 and interleukin-2 activated lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol 4:681, 1986

133. Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT, Muul LM et al: Observations on the systemic administration of autologous lymphokine-activated killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2 to patients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med 313:1485, 1985

134. Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT, Muul LM et al: A progress report on the treatment of 157 patients with advanced cancer using lymphokine-activated killer cells and interleukin-2 or high-dose interleukin-2 alone. N Engl J Med 316:889, 1987

135. West WH, Tauer KW, Yannelli JR et al: Constant-infusion recombinant interleukin-2 in adoptive immunotherapy of advanced cancer. N Engl J Med 316:898, 1987

136. Berek JS: Intraperitoneal adoptive immunotherapy for peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol 8:1610, 1990

137. Topalian SL, Solomon D, Avis FP et al: Immunotherapy of patients with advanced cancer using tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and recombinant interleukin-2: A pilot study. J Clin Oncol 6:839, 1988

138. Lotzova E: Role of human circulating and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in cancer defense and treatment. Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul 9:253, 1990

139. Oomori K, Kikuchi Y, Miyauchi M et al: Effects of lymphokine-activated killer cells and interleukin-2 on the ascites formation and the survival time of nude mice bearing human ovarian cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 115:217, 1989

140. Ottow RT, Steller EP, Sugarbaker PH et al: Immunotherapy of intraperitoneal cancer with interleukin 2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells reduces tumor load and prolongs survival in murine models. Cell Immunol 104:366, 1987

141. Markman M: A pilot trial of daily intraperitoneal administration of recombinant interleukin-2. Reg Cancer Treat 3:44, 1990

142. Lembersky B, Balsisseri Balsisserí M, Kunschner A et al: Phase I-II study of intraperitoneal low dose interleukin-2 in refractory stage III ovarian cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 8:163, 1989

143. Steiss RG, Urba WJ, VanderMolen LA et al: Intraperitoneal lymphokine-activated killer cell and interleukin-2 therapy for malignancies limited to the peritoneal cavity. J Clin Oncol 8:1618, 1990

144. Aoki Y, Takakuwa K, Kodama S et al: Use of adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes alone or in combination with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 51:1834, 1991

145. Dorigo O, Berek JS: Gene therapy for ovarian cancer--Development of novel treatment strategies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 7:1-13, 1997

146. Gomez-Navarro Gómez-Navarro J, Siegal GP et al: Gene therapy: Ovarian carcinoma as the paradigm. Am J Clin Pathol 109:444-467, 1998

147. Robertson MW III, Barnes MN, Rancourt C et al: Gene therapy for ovarian carcinoma. Semin Oncol 25:397-406, 1998

148. Barnes MN, Deshane JS, Rosenfeld M et al: Gene therapy and ovarian cancer: A review. Obstet Gynecol 89:145-155, 1997

149. Tait DL, Obermiller PS, Jensen RA et al: Ovarian cancer gene therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 12:539-552, 1998

150. von Gruenigen VE, Santoso JT, Coleman RL et al: In vivo studies of adenovirus-based p53 gene therapy for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 69:187-204, 1998