This chapter should be cited as follows:
Eggebø TM, Glob. libr. women's med.,
ISSN: 1756-2228; DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.419163
The Continuous Textbook of Women’s Medicine Series – Obstetrics Module
Volume 18
Ultrasound in obstetrics
Volume Editor: Dr Valentina Tsibizova, PREIS International School, Firenze, Italy
Chapter
Ultrasound Evaluation of Assisted Vaginal Delivery
First published: July 2024
Study Assessment Option
By completing 4 multiple-choice questions (randomly selected) after studying this chapter readers can qualify for Continuing Professional Development awards from FIGO plus a Study Completion Certificate from GLOWM
See end of chapter for details
INTRODUCTION
Cesarean section is a lifesaving procedure when medically indicated and should be available for all delivering women.1 National cesarean section rates of up to 19% have been associated with lower maternal or neonatal mortality,2 and this frequency is close to a worldwide estimate of 21% in the period 2010–2018.3 However, the cesarean section rates vary, ranging from 5% in sub-Saharan Africa to 40–50% in other countires.3 Economic, cultural, and organizational factors are important, but also professional practice style and fear of litigation are associated with high cesarean rates.4 Unnecessary cesarean sections are associated with increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications.1 Especially second stage cesarean sections are associated with high risks.5 Unnecessary first cesarean sections should be avoided, because of increased risk of uterine rupture and abnormal placentation in subsequent deliveries.1
Instrumental vaginal delivery is an alternative to late-stage cesarean section. The procedure is often beneficial for the women because it avoids cesarean section and its associated morbidities, and can be performed safely more quickly than a cesarean section.6 In the United Kingdom and Scandinavian countries more than 10% of women are delivered with vacuum extraction or forceps.7,8 However, in low- and mid-resource countries an underuse of these procedures with less than 1% in many institutions has been reported.9,10 A decreased frequency from 9.0% to 3.3% was also observed in the United States from 1992 to 2013.6
The most common indications for an operative vaginal birth are prolonged second stage of labor, suspicion of immediate or potential fetal compromise and shortening of the second stage of labor for maternal benefit.6 Prerequisites before performing the procedure are a fully dilated cervix, ruptured membranes, engagement of the fetal head and exact knowledge of fetal position. These prerequisites are included in the guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).6 The green top guideline from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists prescribes that a safe assisted vaginal birth requires a careful assessment of the clinical situation, clear communication with the woman and healthcare personnel, and expertise in the chosen procedure.11 However, the clinical assessments of fetal descent and position are subjective and unreliable.12,13 Ultrasound assessment of fetal position is more accurate than clinical examination,14 and therefore, has the potential to improve outcome. However, the benefit of examining fetal position has not yet been proven in randomized studies.15
The six basic steps in general ultrasound examinations are to examine the number of fetuses, check fetal heart rate and placental location, estimate the amount of amniotic fluid, assess fetal lie and presentation, and do basic measurements.16 These six steps can also be examined during active labor, however, the number of fetuses and placental location are usually known before labor onset. Confirm vitality before doing a cesarean section. Cesarean section should usually be avoided on dead fetuses. This is only necessary in women with placenta previa, uterine rupture or transverse lie.
1
Fetal heart activity confirmed with ultrasound.
The orientation of the fetus in uterus can be described as fetal lie, position and attitude. The fetal lie can be longitudinal, transverse or oblique. Position means the orientation of the fetal back and fetal head related to the mother, and presentation describes the lowermost part of the fetus in the birth canal. Presentation is usually breech or cephalic, but in cases with transverse lie the presenting part can be the shoulder or the arm. Presentation of the head can be subdivided into occiput, sinciput, brow or face presentation. An exact knowledge about fetal orientation and descent in the birth canal is essential before an operative vaginal delivery. A vacuum cup should be placed over the flexion point and exact knowledge about position is a prerequisite before applying forceps. The direction of traction differs in occiput anterior and occiput posterior positions. In anterior position the fetus can directly follow the curve of the birth canal and extend the neck as soon as the head has passed the symphyses pubis. In occiput posterior position the fetus descends deeper in the birth canal before being directed upwards and the traction should be horizontal to a lower level before directed upwards.17 Video 1 shows traction direction in occiput anterior position and Video 2 in occiput posterior position.
1
Vacuum extraction in occiput anterior (OA) position. Courtesy of Morten Dreier.
2
Vacuum extraction in occiput posterior (OP) position. Courtesy of Morten Dreier.
ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF FETAL ORIENTATION
Start with a transabdominal scan. The ultrasound examination should be done in a structured way, starting with transverse scans followed with a sagittal scan in the midline and both sides (Videoclip 3).
3
Structured transabdominal scan. Courtesy of Morten Dreier.
Fetal lie is essential to know, consider that 20% of breech presentations are undiagnosed at admission in labor wards. The fetal lie can be easily assessed by a transabdominal scan.
Fetal position has traditionally been categorized into eight equal sectors that are also used in some ultrasound studies, however, a simpler method only categorizing into anterior, transverse and posterior positions was suggested by Akmal et al. (Figure 2).18 They described position like a clock face: positions ≥10.00 and ≤02.00 as occiput anterior (OA), positions ≥02.30 and ≤03.30 as left occiput transverse (LOT), positions ≥04.00 and ≤08.00 as occiput posterior (OP) and positions ≥08.30 and ≤09.30 as right occiput transverse (ROT).18 This method is recommended by ISUOG.19
2
Fetal positions differentiated into occiput anterior (OA), left occiput transverse (LOT), occiput posterior (OP) and right occiput transverse (ROT) positions.18
Fetal position can usually be determined by a transverse transabdominal scan. Important landmarks are the fetal eyes, the thalami, the cerebellum and the choroid plexus which are diverging towards the occiput (Figures 3–5 and Videoclips 4–6).20 A longitudinal transabdominal scan is helpful for non-experienced sonographers because the spine can easily be seen (Figure 6 and Videoclip 7), but the midline structures in the fetal head should be obtained in transverse scans for exact determination of position (Figures 3 and 5). At low stations a transperineal scan may be added (Figure 5). Occiput anterior position is associated with an easy operative vaginal delivery; however, operative vaginal procedures can also be done from transverse and posterior positions.21 In these situations, trained birth attendants should be available, and immediately conversion to a cesarean section should be possible if the vaginal procedure fails. One study found that 60% of occiput posterior positions rotated to occiput anterior during a vacuum extraction.21
3
Transabdominal scan showing a fetus in transverse position with occiput at 3 o’clock. Arrow shows the position of occiput. Reproduced with permission from Eggebø et al., 2008.22
4
Transabdominal scan showing a fetus in occiput posterior position (eyes and nose up).
5
Transperineal scan showing a fetus with the occiput at 8 o’clock. The choroid plexus is diverging towards the occiput. The head-perineum distance is marked (white line).
4
Transverse transabdominal scan in left occiput transverse (LOT) position.
5
Transverse transabdominal scan in occiput posterior (OP) position.
6
Transverse transabdominal scan in left occiput transverse (LOT) position at low station (see direction of choroid plexus).
Fetal attitude can in occiput anterior and transverse positions be examined as the angle between the cervical spine and the occipital bone (occiput spine angle).23 In early labor the fetus flexes the neck (Figure 6).
6
Transabdominal scan. Sagittal scan showing fetal head and spine. Left image shows a fetus with extended neck (occiput spine angle 90 degrees), and right images a fetus with flexed neck (occiput spine angle 130 degrees). Left image reproduced with permission from Eggebø et al., 2008.22
7
Longitudinal transabdominal scan.
Late in labor the fetus extends the neck. The occiput spine angle is difficult to measure at low stations due to shadowing from the symphysis pubis, but the extension can be seen as head is directed upwards (Figure 7).
7
Transperineal scan. Head direction downwards in left image and upwards in right image. Courtesy of Johanne Kolvik Iversen.
Head direction is downwards in early labor, changing to horizontal and upward direction during labor progression. The change in head direction is caused by the curved birth canal and by the change in attitude. The head direction should be observed before an operative vaginal delivery, and upward direction is associated with an easy procedure.24
ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF FETAL DESCENT
Fetal head descent can be expressed as fetal station and engagement. Station is traditionally based on clinical vaginal examination of the distal part of the fetal skull and related to the level of the ischial spines with a grading system from −5 to +5 cm (or −3 to +3 in some countries). Engagement is based on a transabdominal examination of the proximal part of the fetal head above the pelvic inlet. The “fifths” method is used for clinical palpation of the fetal head above the pelvic inlet, and engagement occurs when only two-fifths of the head or less is palpable above the brim.25 Engagement is considered as a prerequisite for an operative vaginal delivery.11 The fifths method is inexact and poorly reproducible, but it is still used as the only method to assess descent in the World Health Organization labor care guide from 2020.26
Fetal level in the birth canal can be examined with a transperineal ultrasound examination. The transducer should be placed between the labia as shown in videoclip 8. The frontal plane will be visualized in a transverse scan (videoclip 9), and the sagittal plane in a longitudinal scan (videoclip 10).
8
Structured transperineal scan. Courtesy of Morten Dreier.
9
Transverse transperineal scan showing the fetal skull and compression of the soft tissue.
10
Longitudinal transperinal scan showing the symphysis pubis, the bladder, the urethra, the rectum, and the fetal head directed downwards.
Fetal station can be expressed as angle of progression (AoP) or as head-perineum distance (HPD).27,28 AoP is measured in a sagittal scan as the angle between a line through the long axis of the symphysis pubis and a second line from the inferior end of the symphysis pubis tangentially to the contour of the fetal skull. (Figure 8). 120 degrees corresponds to clinical station 0 and 140 degrees corresponds to clinical station +2.
8
Transperineal scan. Left image: Angle of progression (AoP) = 120 degrees. Membranes not ruptured and amniotic fluid is seen in front of the fetal head. Right image: AoP = 140 degrees.29 Courtesy of Johanne Kolvik Iversen.
HPD is measured as the shortest distance from the fetal skull to perineum, representing the remaining part of the birth canal for the fetus to pass. The ultrasound probe should be placed transversely between labia majora, and the soft tissue should be compressed completely against the pubic bone and the transducer angled until the skull contour is as clear as possible, indicating that the ultrasound beam is perpendicular to the fetal skull (Figures 5 and 9). 35 mm corresponds to clinical station 0 and 25 mm corresponds to clinical station +2.
9
Transperinal scan. Head–perineum distance (HPD) at high station (HPD = 60 mm), mid station (HPD = 35 mm) and low station (HPD = 15 mm). Reproduced from Benekiktsdottir et al., 201830 with permission.
Both methods can predict the probability of a successful operative vaginal delivery.31,27,32 An AoP >120 degrees was associated with an easy vacuum delivery in fetuses in OA position in the original studies,27,32 however, another study including fetuses in all position recommended a cut-off level of 145 degrees.33 HPD ≤35 mm has been recommended as cut-off level for a vacuum attempt,31 but the failure rate was higher in posterior and transverse positions compared with anterior positions.21
ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT IN THE THIRD STAGE OF LABOR
Uterine atony and retained placental tissue are the most common causes of postpartum hemorrhage. The uterus can be examined with a transabdominal scan after delivery. Retained placental tissue can be seen as echogenic tissue in the uterus (Figure 10). A small amount of blood is often seen in the uterus after delivery as a normal finding. However, a large amount of blood within the uterus, the cervix (Figure 11) or in the vagina should be manually removed.
10
Transverse scan of uterus with retained placental tissue.
11
Longitudinal scan of uterus with retained placental tissue (left image) and a large blood clot in the cervix (right image).
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound has the potential to reassure clinicians that an operative vaginal delivery is a safe procedure in fetuses at low stations. When examined between contractions, favorable prognostic factors in anterior positions are head direction upwards, AoP >120 degrees and HPD <35 mm (corresponding to clinical station 0). More caution should be shown in transverse and posterior positions. Favorable prognostic signs in these situations are head direction upwards, AoP >140 degrees and HPD <25 mm (corresponding to clinical station +2). Movement of the fetal head during contractions and with pushing is also a favorable factor.
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS
- There is an underuse of operative vaginal deliveries in many countries.
- Second stage cesarean sections are associated with high risks.
- Fetal position and attitude can be examined with a transabdominal scan.
- Head direction and fetal descent can be examined with a transperineal scan.
- Clinical station 0 corresponds to angle of progression 120 degrees and head-perineum distance 35 mm.
- Clinical station +2 corresponds to angle of progression 140 degrees and head-perineum distance 25 mm.
- Ultrasound can reassure clinicians that an operative vaginal delivery is a safe option in women with a fetus in occiput anterior position at a low station.
- Look for retained placental tissue in women with postpartum hemorrhage.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The author(s) of this chapter declare that they have no interests that conflict with the contents of the chapter.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author would like to thank Morten Dreier for creating Videos 1, 2, 3 and 8, and to thank Johanne Kolvik Iversen for acquiring ultrasound images in Figures 7 and 8.
REFERENCES
Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 2018;392:1349–57. | |
Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, et al. Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality. JAMA 2015;314:2263–70. | |
Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health 2021;6. | |
Opiyo N, Kingdon C, Oladapo OT, et al. Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: WHO recommendations. Bull World Health Organ 2020;98:66–8. | |
Pergialiotis V, Vlachos DG, Rodolakis A, et al. First versus second stage C/S maternal and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;175:15–24. | |
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative Vaginal Birth: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 219. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e149–59. | |
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists,Assisted vaginal birth (ventouse or forceps), 2020. https://www.rcog.org.uk/for-the-public/browse-all-patient-information-leaflets/assisted-vaginal-birth-ventouse-or-forceps/. | |
Elvander C, Ekeus C, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. Reason for the increasing use of vacuum extraction in Sweden: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:1175–82. | |
Ameh CA, Weeks, AD. The role of instrumental vaginal delivery in low resource settings. BJOG 2009;116(Suppl 1):22–5. | |
Bailey PE, van Roosmalen J, Mola G, et al. Assisted vaginal delivery in low and middle income countries: an overview. BJOG 2017;124:1335–44. | |
Murphy DJ, Strachan BK, Bahl R, et al. Assisted Vaginal Birth: Green-top Guideline No. 26. BJOG 2020;127:e70–112. | |
Dupuis O, Ruimark S, Corinne D, et al. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;123:193–7. | |
Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:868–74. | |
Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, et al. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG 2014;121:1029–38. | |
Bellussi F, Di Mascio D, Salsi G, et al. Sonographic knowledge of occiput position to decrease failed operative vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;226:499–509. | |
Abuhamad A, Zhao Y, Abuhamad S, et al. Standardized Six-Step Approach to the Performance of the Focused Basic Obstetric Ultrasound Examination. Am J Perinatol 2016;33:90–8. | |
Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, et al. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:82–9. | |
Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, et al. Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:425–8. | |
Ghi T, Eggebo T, Lees C, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52:128–39. | |
Youssef A, Ghi T, Pilu G. How to perform ultrasound in labor: assessment of fetal occiput position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:476–8. | |
Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Fetal rotation during vacuum extractions for prolonged labor: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:998–1005. | |
Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, et al. Prediction of labour and delivery by ascertaining the fetal head position with transabdominal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabour rupture of membranes after 37 weeks. Ultraschall Med 2008;29:179-83. | |
Ghi T, Bellussi F, Azzarone C, et al. The "occiput-spine angle": a new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:84 e81–7. | |
Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, et al. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:753–60. | |
Crichton D. A reliable method of establishing the level of the fetal head in obstetrics. S Afr Med J 1974;48:784–7. | |
World Health Organization,WHO labour care guide: user’s manual, 2020./ https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017566. | |
Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:313–9. | |
Eggebo TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:387–91. | |
Eggebo TM, Hjartardottir H. Descent of the presenting part assessed with ultrasound, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;230:S901-12. | |
Benekiktsdottir et al. Reproducibility and acceptability of ultrasound measurements of head-perneum distance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:97–103 | |
Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:69 e61–69 e10. | |
Kalache KD, Duckelmann AM, Michaelis SA, et al. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:326–30. | |
Bultez T, Quibel T, Bouhanna P, et al. Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:86–91. |
STUDY ASSESSMENT
Question 1
Which statement is true?
(a) | The accuracy of ultrasound and clinical assessments is equal | |
(b) | Fetal position can only be examined with transperinal ultrasound | |
(c) | Head direction is upwards in early labor | |
(d) | Information about fetal position and descent should be combined before doing an operative vaginal delivery |
Question 2
Where is the occiput when you see the fetal nose at 11 o’clock
(a) | at 3 o’clock | |
(b) | at 4 o’clock | |
(c) | at 5 o’clock | |
(d) | Impossible to know because the neck could not be seen |
Question 3
How should position be classified when the fetal nose is seen at 10 o’clock?
(a) | Occiput anterior | |
(b) | Left occiput transverse | |
(c) | Right occiput transverse | |
(d) | Occiput posterior |
Question 4
Clinical station 0 corresponds to angle of progression:
(a) | 100 degrees | |
(b) | 120 degrees | |
(c) | 130 degrees | |
(d) | 140 degrees |
Question 5
Clinical station +2 corresponds to angle of progression:
(a) | 100 degrees | |
(b) | 120 degrees | |
(c) | 130 degrees | |
(d) | 140 degrees |
Question 6
In which situation would you do a vacuum attempt?
(a) | Head direction downwards and angle of progression 130 degrees | |
(b) | Head direction upwards and angle of progression 130 degrees | |
(c) | Head direction upwards and angle of progression 115 degrees | |
(d) | Head direction upwards and head-perineum distance 40 mm |
Question 7
You find a fetus with occiput at 1 o’clock, head direction upwards, angle of progression 140 degrees and head perineum distance 25 mm. You consider a vacuum attempt. What is true?
(a) | The failure risk is low | |
(b) | You should do a cesarean without any vacuum attempt | |
(c) | There is no risk of a failure | |
(d) | You can try vacuum, but the failure risk is high |